CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Rumex arifolius

species of plant in the family Polygonaceae

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 25, 2022
Entity authorityQ62024023
Source-derived summary

Rumex arifolius, common name maiden sorrel or mountain dock, is a leafy perennial herb in the family Polygonaceae.

Description

Rumex arifolius can reach a height of 70–120 centimetres (28–47 in). This plant has fleshy large leaves with entire blade margins. The inconspicuous white flowers and seeds are carried on long clusters at the top of a stalk arising from the axil of leaves. The flowers are dioecious and anemophilous. They bloom from May to June.

Taxonomy

Rumex arifolius was first described by Carl Christian Gmelin in 1806.

Distribution

Maiden sorrel is native to southern Europe, and parts of northern temperate Asia.

Habitat

This species prefers pine forests and mountainous meadows at elevation of 200–700 metres (660–2,300 ft) above sea level.

References

External links

"Rumex arifolius".

Editorial summary

“Rumex arifolius” enters the record as species of plant in the family Polygonaceae. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rumex, arifolius and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1806—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Rumex, arifolius and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Rumex arifolius” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rumex, arifolius and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 25, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q62024023. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1806.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rumex arifolius”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rumex arifolius primary sources, Rumex arifolius archive and Rumex research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rumex arifolius”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Rumex arifolius” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.