Rumasa
Spanish holding company
José María Ruiz-Mateos Sociedad Anónima (Rumasa) was a holding company founded by Spanish entrepreneur José María Ruiz Mateos and expropriated by the Spanish government on February 23, 1983.
In 1982 Rumasa constituted 2% of the Spanish GDP[1]. The 700 different businesses with 65000 employees forming the holding, from banks to hotels, were partitioned and reprivatizated.
Ruiz Mateos fled the country days after the expropriation and was later jailed in Spain. The expropriation was ruled constitutional by the Spanish Constitutional Court in 1986. Ruíz Mateos was acquitted by the Spanish Supreme Court in 1999, though he has never been compensated by the Spanish state.
Ruiz Mateos later founded "Nueva Rumasa" ("New Rumasa" [2]), which filed for bankruptcy in 2011 after issuing a series of highly controversial IOUs [3].
Sponsorship
Between 1999 and 2005, Rumasa was the main kit sponsor of Spanish football club Rayo Vallecano.
References
Real Decreto-Ley 2/1983, de 23 de febrero, de expropiación, por razones de utilidad pública e interés social, de los bancos y otras sociedades que componen el grupo "RUMASA, S. A."
Sentencia 111/1983, de 2/12/1983, del pleno del Tribunal Constitucional de España, desestimando el recurso de inconstitucionalidad núm. 116/1983, promovido por José María Ruiz Gallardón, como representante y comisionado de cincuenta y cuatro Diputados más, contra el Real Decreto-ley 2/1983.
“Rumasa” enters the record as spanish holding company. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rumasa, Spanish and holding can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Rumasa” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rumasa, Spanish and holding provides the most credible route into that argument.
The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q175855. VIAF identifies the subject as 158323192. The Library of Congress control number is n84050459. None of the 3 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1983, 1982, 1986 and 1999.
Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Rumasa”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Rumasa primary sources, Rumasa archive and Rumasa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rumasa”?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Rumasa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.