CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Rudinei

Brazilian footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 27, 2025
Entity authorityQ97959621 ↗
Source-derived summary

Rudinei Amâncio (born 5 March 1975) is a former Brazilian footballer. He played professionally in both Brazil and China, most notably for Criciúma in 1995.

Editorial summary

“Rudinei” enters the record as brazilian footballer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rudinei, Brazilian and footballer can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1975, 1995—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1975-03-05. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Rudinei, Brazilian and footballer.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Rudinei” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rudinei, Brazilian and footballer provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q97959621. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1975 and 1995.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rudinei”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rudinei primary sources, Rudinei archive and Rudinei research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rudinei”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Rudinei” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.