CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Rudafshan

village in Damavand County, Iran

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 23, 2025
Entity authorityQ5870123
Source-derived summary

Rudafshan (Persian: رودافشان, also Romanized as Rūdafshān) is a village in Abarshiveh Rural District, in the Central District of Damavand County, Tehran Province, Iran. At the 2016 census, its population was 54, in 19 families. Up from 47 in 2006.

Tourism

Rudafshan Cave is one of the tourist attractions near Tehran City, which is located in a village in Damavand County.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Rudafshan” is village in Damavand County, Iran. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Rudafshan, village and Damavand, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016, 2006—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Rudafshan, village and Damavand is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “village in Damavand County, Iran” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5870123. Authority coordinates are 35.641, 52.501. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2016 and 2006.

Critical limits

Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rudafshan”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rudafshan primary sources, Rudafshan archive and Rudafshan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rudafshan”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Rudafshan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.