Route 36 (bar)
cocaine bar

Route 36 is an illegal after-hours lounge in La Paz, Bolivia, and according to The Guardian it is the world's first cocaine bar; however, this description has been argued as being inaccurate. Although cocaine, an addictive stimulant derived from the coca plant, is illegal in Bolivia, political corruption and affordability of locally produced cocaine have resulted in Route 36 becoming a popular destination for thousands of drug tourists each year.
History
The concept of Route 36 as a cocaine bar was created in the late-2000s. Entry is often only granted by local taxi drivers vouching for potential patrons or by patrons being asked questions by the door security staff to ascertain that they are not undercover police officers. Many customers learn about the bar's existence through travel websites and by word of mouth promotion. To avoid complaints from nearby business owners or residents, Route 36 does not operate in the same location for more than a few weeks at a time. Its location can only be found by word of mouth information. The location is usually known locally, with opponents of the bar often refusing to tell tourists asking about it where it is on the grounds of the illegality of cocaine and belief it was giving Bolivia a bad name. At Route 36, consumption of cocaine is actively encouraged with bartenders often offering it after any drinks-only orders are made; however, some media commentators have speculated that the bar provides low quality cocaine in order to cater to the drug tourist market.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Route 36 (bar)” as cocaine bar. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as cocaine bar. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7371433. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Route 36 (bar)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Route 36 (bar) primary sources, Route 36 (bar) archive and Route research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Route 36 (bar)”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Route 36 (bar)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.