CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cyrillic O variants

alternative forms for the Cyrillic letter O

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ136593054 ↗
Source-derived summary

This is a list of rare glyph variants of the Cyrillic letter O. They were proposed for inclusion into Unicode in 2007 and incorporated as in Unicode 5.1.

Monocular O

Monocular O (Ꙩ ꙩ) is one of the rare glyph variants of Cyrillic letter O. This glyph variant was used in certain manuscripts in the root word ꙩко "eye", and also in some other functions, for example, in the word- and syllable-initial position. It is used in some late birchbark letters of the 14th and 15th centuries, where it is usually differentiated from a regular о, used after consonants, also by width, being a broad On (ѻ) with a dot inside.

The letter resembles International Phonetic Alphabet bilabial click (ʘ) and the Gothic letter hwair (𐍈).

Binocular O

Binocular O (Ꙫ ꙫ) is found in certain manuscripts in the plural or dual forms of the root word eye, like Ꙫчи.

A similar jocular glyph (called "double-dot wide O") has been suggested as a phonetic symbol for the "nasal-ingressive velar trill", a paralinguistic impression of a snort, due to the graphic resemblance to a pig snout.

Double monocular O

Double monocular O (Ꙭ ꙭ) is one of the exotic glyph variants of the Cyrillic letter O. This glyph variant can be found in certain manuscripts in the plural or dual forms of the word eye, for example ꙭчи "[two] eyes".

Multiocular O

Multiocular O (ꙮ) is a unique glyph variant found in a single 15th-century manuscript (therefore a hapax legomenon), in the Old Church Slavonic phrase серафими многоꙮчитїи (abbreviated мн̑оꙮ҆читїи̑; serafimi mnogoočitii, 'many-eyed seraphim'). It was documented by Yefim Karsky in 1928 in the Buslaev Psalter, a psalter (copy of the Book of Psalms with additional material) originally believed to be from around 1429, now dated to c. 1487 – c. 1490 and found in the collection of the Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius.

Editorial summary

“Cyrillic O variants” enters the record as alternative forms for the Cyrillic letter O. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cyrillic, variants and alternative can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007, 1928, 1429, 1487—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2007. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cyrillic, variants and alternative.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cyrillic O variants” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cyrillic, variants and alternative provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q136593054. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007, 1928, 1429 and 1487.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cyrillic O variants”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cyrillic O variants primary sources, Cyrillic O variants archive and Cyrillic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cyrillic O variants”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cyrillic O variants” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.