CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Rotalidia

class of amoeboid protists

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ7370218
Source-derived summary

Rotalidia comprises a class of Foraminifera where Foraminifera is regarded as a phylum, (Kingdom Protista or Rhizaria, not Chromista) that unites Foraminifera that have tests composed of secreted lamellar calcium carbonate, optically radial or granular calcite, or aragonite; separating them from those with porcelaneous, agglutinated, or microgranular, tests, or tests composed of organic compounds. Seven orders are included, the:

Rotaliida Delage & Hérouard, 1896

Carterinida Loeblich & Tappan, 1981

Globigerinida Delage & Hérouard, 1896

Involutinida Hohenegger & Piller, 1977

Lagenida Delage & Hérouard, 1896

Silicoloculinida Resig et al. 1980

Spirillinida Hohenegger & Piller, 1975.

Editorial summary

“Rotalidia” enters the record as class of amoeboid protists. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rotalidia, class and amoeboid can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1896, 1981, 1977, 1980—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Rotalidia, class and amoeboid.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Rotalidia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rotalidia, class and amoeboid provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7370218. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1896, 1981, 1977 and 1980.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rotalidia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rotalidia primary sources, Rotalidia archive and Rotalidia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rotalidia”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Rotalidia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.