CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Rotae Passionis

Chamber composition by Christopher Rouse

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ7370210
Source-derived summary

Rotae Passionis ('Passion Wheels') is a piece for mixed chamber ensemble by the American composer Christopher Rouse. It was commissioned by Boston Musica Viva and completed in 1983, when the work was first performed. It is dedicated to Carl Orff, who died the previous year.

Instrumentation

The work is scored for seven players:

flute (doubling piccolo and alto flute)

clarinet (doubling E-flat and bass clarinets)

percussion

piano

violin

viola

cello

At certain points in the work, the wind players and the pianist are also required to play percussion instruments.

Structure

The work consists of three parts, each representing an element of the Passion story:

Circuitus Lamentationis - Dolor in Horto (Agony in the Garden)

Rotae Passionis (Passion Wheels) (based on the Fourteen Stations of the Cross)

Rota Parallela - Christus in Somno

Inspiration for the composition was derived from Northern Renaissance art, in particular the works of Hieronymus Bosch and Matthias Grünewald. The approach of these artists to the subject of the Crucifixion appealed to Rouse because they conveyed the anguish of the Passion more emphatically than their Italian counterparts. Each part of the work can therefore be interpreted as a panel from a triptych altarpiece.

Material in the composition is developed in a circular fashion, hence the 'wheel' concept: this notion was also inspired by the 'Rota Fortunae' of Orff's Carmina Burana.

Editorial summary

“Rotae Passionis” enters the record as chamber composition by Christopher Rouse. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rotae, Passionis and Chamber can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1983—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Rotae, Passionis and Chamber.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Rotae Passionis” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rotae, Passionis and Chamber provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7370210. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1983.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rotae Passionis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rotae Passionis primary sources, Rotae Passionis archive and Rotae research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rotae Passionis”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Rotae Passionis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.