CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus

species of bacterium

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ16992325
Source-derived summary

Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus is a species of bacterium, the type species of its genus.

Description

It is an obligately aerobic, bacteriochlorophyll a-containing bacteria.

References

Further reading

Yurkov, Vladimir; Gad'on, Nasser; Drews, Gerhart (1993). "The major part of polar carotenoids of the aerobic bacteria Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus RB3 and Erythromicrobium ramosum E5 is not bound to the bacteriochlorophyll a-complexes of the photosynthetic apparatus". Archives of Microbiology. 160 (5). doi:10.1007/BF00252223. ISSN 0302-8933. S2CID 24889229.

External links

"Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus".

Editorial summary

“Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus” enters the record as species of bacterium. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Roseococcus, thiosulfatophilus and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1993, 1007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Roseococcus, thiosulfatophilus and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Roseococcus, thiosulfatophilus and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16992325. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1993 and 1007.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus primary sources, Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus archive and Roseococcus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.