CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Second Roman cabinet

Romanian government cabinet

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 9, 2025
Entity authorityQ7362008 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Second Roman cabinet was the government of Romania from 28 June 1990 through 30 April 1991, led by Prime Minister Petre Roman. It was a single-party majority cabinet; it was formed only by the party that won the elections with 66% of the vote, the National Salvation Front (Frontul Salvării Naționale, FSN). The cabinet included a few independents.

Members

Single-party majority cabinet (FSN, Frontul Salvării Naționale, National Salvation Front), plus independents.

Editorial summary

“Second Roman cabinet” enters the record as romanian government cabinet. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Second, Roman and cabinet can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1990, 1991—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Second, Roman and cabinet.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Second Roman cabinet” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Second, Roman and cabinet provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 9, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7362008. The first chronological checks are 1990 and 1991.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Second Roman cabinet”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Second Roman cabinet primary sources, Second Roman cabinet archive and Second research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Second Roman cabinet”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Second Roman cabinet” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.