CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Roma di Luna

American folk/Americana group

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ126365826 ↗
Source-derived summary

Roma di Luna is an American folk/Americana group from Minneapolis, Minnesota, formed in 2004. The band released four records, including most recently We Were Made To Forgive in 2018. The group began as a husband-and-wife duo comprising Alexei Casselle of Kill the Vultures and Channy Leaneagh, later of Poliça, before expanding to a group of seven.

While the group did not break through to mainstream success, they were consistently praised by critics and musicians such as Liz Phair.

History

2004-07: Formation, Face Of My Friends, and Find Your Way Home

Casselle and Leaneagh met in high school and dated off and on before starting a musical duo in 2004, and started performing by busking at local farmer's markets in Minneapolis. The name "Roma di Luna" roughly translates to "gypsies of the moon," and refers to the band's interest in Eastern European folk music, and shared European and Native American heritage.

Casselle had previously been known as a rapper with the groups Oddjobs and Kill the Vultures. His interest in blues and folk music was ignited by becoming a fan of Bob Dylan while living in New York with Oddjobs, which inspired him to learn guitar. Leaneagh, who grew up listening to folk and Americana music, was also classically trained on violin. Leaneagh was also influenced by singers such as Billie Holiday, Hank Williams, and Indian and South Asian female singers.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Roma di Luna” as american folk/Americana group. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004, 2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Roma, Luna and American can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as american folk/Americana group. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q126365826. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2004 and 2018.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Roma di Luna”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Roma di Luna primary sources, Roma di Luna archive and Roma research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Roma di Luna”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Roma di Luna” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.