CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Roki Tunnel

tunnel in Russia and South Ossetia/Georgia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ932910
Source-derived summary

The Roki Tunnel (also known as the Roksky Tunnel; Georgian: როკის გვირაბი; Ossetian: Ручъы тъунел; Russian: Рокский туннель) is a road tunnel through the Greater Caucasus Mountains. It forms part of the Transkam road and connects North Ossetia–Alania in Russia with South Ossetia, a region internationally recognized as part of Georgia but de facto controlled by the South Ossetian authorities. The tunnel was completed in 1984 and is approximately 3,730 metres long.

The tunnel, completed by the Soviet government in 1984, is one of only a handful of routes that cross the North Caucasus Range. The tunnel lies at an elevation of approximately 2,000 metres and is 3,730 metres long. It passes beneath the Greater Caucasus near the Roki Pass, which reaches an elevation of approximately 3,000 metres and is accessible only during the summer months.

The other routes between Georgia and Russia include the Kazbegi–Verkhni Lars customs checkpoint on the Georgian Military Road, closed June 2006  and reopened 2010, and the Gantiadi–Adler crossing in Abkhazia which Georgia asserts functions illegally.

The tunnel has been important throughout the Georgian–Ossetian conflict. The South Ossetian authorities use tolls levied on tunnel traffic as one of their main sources of revenue. The Georgian government, backed by the United States, has long called for the South Ossetian side of the tunnel to be placed under the control of international monitors, rather than by the South Ossetian secessionists and their Russian allies.

Editorial summary

“Roki Tunnel” enters the record as tunnel in Russia and South Ossetia/Georgia. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Roki, Tunnel and tunnel can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1984, 2006, 2010—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1985. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Roki, Tunnel and tunnel.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Roki Tunnel” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Roki, Tunnel and tunnel provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q932910. Authority coordinates are 42.612, 44.100. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1984, 2006 and 2010.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Roki Tunnel”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Roki Tunnel primary sources, Roki Tunnel archive and Roki research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Roki Tunnel”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Roki Tunnel” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.