CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Roger Guillemin

French-American neuroscientist (1924–2024)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ242169
Source-derived summary

Roger Charles Louis Guillemin (French pronunciation: [ʁɔʒe ʃaʁl lwi ɡijmɛ̃]; January 11, 1924 – February 21, 2024) was a French-American neuroscientist. He received the National Medal of Science in 1976, and the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1977 for his work on neurohormones, sharing the prize that year with Andrew Schally and Rosalyn Sussman Yalow.

Biography

Guillemin was born in Dijon, France. After secondary studies at the Lycée Carnot in Dijon, he began his medical studies at the University of Dijon in 1943. He completed his medical studies at the University of Lyon and received MD degree in 1949. He worked as a doctor in a small village in Burgundy, and went to Montreal, Quebec, Canada, to work with Hans Selye at the Institute of Experimental Medicine and Surgery at the Université de Montréal where he received a Ph.D. in 1953. In 1965, he became a naturalized citizen of the United States.

In 1954, Guillemin observed that pituitary cells do not produce hormones unless hypothalamic cells are present, which supported the theory that the hypothalamus controls the pituitary through hormones, dubbed releasing factors. Guillemin moved to Baylor College of Medicine, in Houston, to develop that finding. Andrzej V. Schally, known in the US as Andrew Schally, joined him in 1957.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Roger Guillemin” is french-American neuroscientist (1924–2024). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Roger, Guillemin and French-American, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1924, 2024, 1976, 1977—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1924-01-11. For this dossier, Roger, Guillemin and French-American is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “french-American neuroscientist (1924–2024)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q242169. VIAF identifies the subject as 109127804. The Library of Congress control number is n84125927. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1924, 2024, 1976 and 1977.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Roger Guillemin”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Roger Guillemin primary sources, Roger Guillemin archive and Roger research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Roger Guillemin”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Roger Guillemin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.