CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Rogacze

village in Podlaskie, Poland

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ2002693
Source-derived summary

Rogacze [rɔˈɡat͡ʂɛ] is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Milejczyce, within Siemiatycze County, Podlaskie Voivodeship, in eastern Poland. It is situated on the Nurczyk River.

According to the 1921 census, the village was inhabited by 299 people, among whom 12 were Roman Catholic, 264 Orthodox, and 23 Jewish. At the same time, 19 inhabitants declared Polish nationality, 255 Belarusian and 16 Jewish. There were 54 residential buildings in the village.

Editorial summary

“Rogacze” enters the record as village in Podlaskie, Poland. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rogacze, village and Podlaskie can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1921—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Rogacze, village and Podlaskie.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Rogacze” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rogacze, village and Podlaskie provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2002693. Authority coordinates are 52.517, 23.233. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1921.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rogacze”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rogacze primary sources, Rogacze archive and Rogacze research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rogacze”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Rogacze” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.