Rodney Island
island in Queensland, Australia

Rodney Island is a small island in Shelburne Bay in far north Queensland, Australia a few hundred metres north of Cape Grenville, Cape York Peninsula in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Queensland, Australia. It is part of the Cape York to Cape Grenville Islands Important Bird Area.
Mining
The threat of mining to the area became evident in the 1980s when it emerged that the
dune fields of Shelburne Bay were being targeted by the silica sandmining industry. The mining of
mining leases 5940 and 5941, the last remaining mining leases in the area, would have involved
removing and destroying two major dune systems together with the construction of a major port
facility from the eastern end of Shelburne Bay via Rodney Island to the deep water offshore.
Public concern at the prospect of sandmining over parts of Shelburne Bay was a key factor in the
implementation of the joint state and Commonwealth Cape York Land Use Study. This study,
undertaken between 1989 and 1998, was to ensure that appropriate land use decisions on Cape
York would be made following wide public consultation and an assessment of competing land
uses and values.
The Shelburne Bay project was worth $4,000 million a year to the Australian economy. It
was to mine 200,000 tonnes a year of pure silicon. At that time the price of pure silicon meant
that it was worth $4,000 million to the Australian economy. It is a 99.98 per cent super pure
rich deposit.
“Rodney Island” enters the record as island in Queensland, Australia. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rodney, Island and island can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Rodney Island” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rodney, Island and island provides the most credible route into that argument.
Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7356953. Authority coordinates are -11.889, 143.108. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1989 and 1998.
Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.
- Historic place names
- Jurisdictional context
- Routes into maps and plans
Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Rodney Island”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Rodney Island primary sources, Rodney Island archive and Rodney research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rodney Island”?
- Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
- Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Rodney Island” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.