Roberto de Lucena
Brazilian politician
Roberto de Lucena (born 18 April 1966) is a Brazilian evangelical pastor, writer, and politician affiliated with the Republicanos party
Personal life
He is the son of Antonio Vieira de Lucena and Eunice Alves de Lucena. In addition to being a politician, de Lucena is a writer and a pastor of the Igreja Evangélica Pentecostal O Brasil Para Cristo.
Religious Involvement
Graduated in Religious studies from the Ecumenical Institute of Higher Education in 1999, Lucena is a pastor of the Evangelical Pentecostal Church "Brazil for Christ." He served as president of the church in Arujá from 1991 to 2010 and of the Supreme Council of the Brazil for Christ Church from 1999 to 2005. He also held positions in the National Council of Pastors of Brazil, the Bible Society of Brazil, and the National Christian Front for Social and Political Action. He is the author of the book Faith, Work, and Hope, published in 2018.
Political career
On 17 April 2016, he voted in favor of the impeachment proceedings against Dilma Rousseff. During Michel Temer's administration, he supported the Constitutional Amendment Bill on the Public Spending Cap. In April 2017, he opposed the Labor Reform. In August 2017, he voted against the motion to open an investigation into then-president Michel Temer, contributing to the shelving of the charges brought by the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office.
Throughout his three terms, Roberto de Lucena served as president of the Brazil–United Nations Parliamentary Support Group (GPONU); vice president of the Tourism Committee in the Chamber of Deputies; member of the Parliamentary Front for Tourism in the National Congress; Secretary for Transparency of the Chamber of Deputies; and chaired the Standing Committee on Financial Oversight and Control.
“Roberto de Lucena” enters the record as brazilian politician. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Roberto, Lucena and Brazilian can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Roberto de Lucena” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Roberto, Lucena and Brazilian provides the most credible route into that argument.
Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q24035071. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1966, 1999, 1991 and 2010.
A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Roberto de Lucena”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Roberto de Lucena primary sources, Roberto de Lucena archive and Roberto research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Roberto de Lucena”?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Roberto de Lucena” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.