Robert S. Huie
American lawyer
Robert Steven Huie (born 1976) is an American lawyer from California who is serving as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
Early life and education
Huie was born in 1976 in Albany, Georgia. He received his Bachelor of Arts from Calvin University in 1998 and his Juris Doctor from Yale Law School in 2002.
Career
Huie served as a law clerk for Judge José A. Cabranes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 2003 to 2004. He worked as a civil litigator at Latham & Watkins from 2004 to 2008 and as an attorney at Wiggin and Dana from 2002 to 2003. From 2008 to 2020, he served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the criminal division of the United States Attorney's office for the Southern District of California where he was Deputy Chief of the Office's Major Frauds and Public Corruption Section. He helped lead the early prosecution of the Fat Leonard scandal, which involved corruption in the United States Navy. From 2015 to 2018, Huie served as a legal advisor to the United States Department of Justice's Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training.
From 2020 to 2022, he was a counsel with Jones Day in their San Diego office, where he served on the firm's Diversity, Inclusion & Advancement Committee.
Federal judicial service
On January 19, 2022, President Joe Biden named Huie to serve as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
“Robert S. Huie” enters the record as american lawyer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Robert, Huie and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Robert S. Huie” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Robert, Huie and American provides the most credible route into that argument.
Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q110622363. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1976, 1998, 2002 and 2003.
Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Robert S. Huie”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Robert S. Huie primary sources, Robert S. Huie archive and Robert research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Robert S. Huie”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Robert S. Huie” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.