CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Rob Teilhet

American politician from Georgia

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ7340598 ↗
Source-derived summary

Robert Brandon Teilhet is an American Democratic politician who served as a member of the Georgia House of Representatives from 2003 to 2011. He represented District 40, which encompassed parts of southeastern Cobb County.

Teilhet graduated from the University of Georgia (UGA) with a Bachelor of Arts (A.B.) degree in 1996 and a Juris Doctor (J.D.) from the UGA School of Law in 2000.

A member of the Georgia House of Representatives in Georgia, following a record of service in the Georgia House of Representatives, Teilhet was a 2010 candidate for Attorney General of the State of Georgia but lost the Democratic primary to Ken Hodges.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Rob Teilhet” as american politician from Georgia. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Teilhet, American and politician.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2003, 2011, 1996, 2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Teilhet, American and politician providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Rob Teilhet”, the useful work is to connect “american politician from Georgia” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7340598. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2003, 2011, 1996 and 2000.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rob Teilhet”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rob Teilhet primary sources, Rob Teilhet archive and Teilhet research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rob Teilhet”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Rob Teilhet” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.