Ritterstein
German name given to markers made of sandstone
A Ritterstein ("Ritter Stone") is the German name given to markers made of sandstone erected at sites of historic or natural interest in the Palatine Forest, a range of low mountains in the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate. In some cases, glacial erratics were used, in others, rocks or walls at the site were used on which to carve the information.
The stones are typically inscribed with their name, a suitable symbol, the date they were erected, their height above sea level and the initials PWV for the Pfälzerwald-Verein or Palatine Forest Club, who set up and look after the stones. They are named after chief forester, Karl Albrecht von Ritter (died 1917), the founding chairman of the PWV, who initiated the system in the early 20th century.
References
Literature
Walter Eitelmann; Ernst Kimmel (2005), Rittersteine im Pfälzerwald : Mit 59 Wandervorschlägen (in German) (5. ed.), Neustadt an der Weinstr.: Pfälzerwald-Verein, ISBN 3-00-003544-3
Landesamt für Vermessung und Geobasisinformation Rheinland-Pfalz, Naturpark Pfälzerwald : Topografische Karte 1:25000 (in German), ISBN 978-3-89637-399-1
Erhard Rohe (2002), "Die Rittersteine im Pfälzerwald", in Pfälzerwald-Verein (ed.), 100 Jahre Pfälzerwald-Verein (in German), Neustadt an der Weinstr., pp.
The public source identifies “Ritterstein” as german name given to markers made of sandstone. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Ritterstein, German and name.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Ritterstein”, the useful work is to connect “german name given to markers made of sandstone” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1674062. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1917, 2005 and 2002.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Ritterstein”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Ritterstein primary sources, Ritterstein archive and Ritterstein research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ritterstein”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Ritterstein” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.