CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Rik Taam

Dutch decathlete

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ105870603 ↗
Source-derived summary

Rik Taam (Dutch: [rɪk ˈtaːm]; born 17 January 1997) is a Dutch athlete competing in the combined events. He represented his country at the 2021 European Indoor Championships narrowly missing out on a medal.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Rik Taam” as dutch decathlete. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Taam, Dutch and decathlete.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1997, 2021—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1997-01-17. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Taam, Dutch and decathlete providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Rik Taam”, the useful work is to connect “dutch decathlete” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q105870603. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1997 and 2021.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rik Taam”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rik Taam primary sources, Rik Taam archive and Taam research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rik Taam”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Rik Taam” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.