CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Richard Bishop (painter)

American painter (1887–1975)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ52156600 ↗
Source-derived summary

Richard Evett Bishop (May 30, 1887 – February 1975) was an American painter. He was born in Syracuse, New York. His work was part of the painting event in the art competition at the 1932 Summer Olympics.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Richard Bishop (painter)” is american painter (1887–1975). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Richard, Bishop and painter, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1887, 1975, 1932—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1887-01-01. For this dossier, Richard, Bishop and painter is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american painter (1887–1975)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q52156600. VIAF identifies the subject as 18665636. The Library of Congress control number is n85221491. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1887, 1975 and 1932.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Richard Bishop (painter)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Richard Bishop (painter) primary sources, Richard Bishop (painter) archive and Richard research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Richard Bishop (painter)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Richard Bishop (painter)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.