CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ricardo da Benta

Portuguese rower

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 27, 2025
Entity authorityQ56276263
Source-derived summary

Ricardo dos Santos da Benta (25 November 1923 – 22 October 2006) was a Portuguese rower. He competed in the men's eight event at the 1948 Summer Olympics. Da Benta died in Glória e Vera Cruz on 22 October 2006, at the age of 82.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Ricardo da Benta” is portuguese rower. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Ricardo, Benta and Portuguese, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1923, 2006, 1948—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1923-11-25. For this dossier, Ricardo, Benta and Portuguese is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “portuguese rower” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q56276263. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1923, 2006 and 1948.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ricardo da Benta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ricardo da Benta primary sources, Ricardo da Benta archive and Ricardo research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ricardo da Benta”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ricardo da Benta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.