CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Rhexophiale

genus of fungi

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 11, 2024
Entity authorityQ10652310 ↗
Source-derived summary

Rhexophiale is a small genus of lichen-forming fungi in the family Sagiolechiaceae. The genus was circumscribed by Theodor Magnus Fries in 1860. It comprises two species:

Rhexophiale coronata Th.Fr. (1860)

Rhexophiale rhexoblephara (Nyl.) Almq. (1887)

Molecular phylogenetics analysis has shown that Rhexophiale coronata lies within a clade with Sagiolechia phaeospora and S. protuberans, which challenges the distinctiveness of the genus Rhexophiale.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Rhexophiale” is genus of fungi. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Rhexophiale, genus and fungi, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1860, 1887—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Rhexophiale, genus and fungi is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “genus of fungi” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 11, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q10652310. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1860 and 1887.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rhexophiale”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rhexophiale primary sources, Rhexophiale archive and Rhexophiale research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rhexophiale”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Rhexophiale” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.