Centre pour l'Édition Électronique Ouverte
Centre for Open Electronic Publishing
The Centre pour l'Édition Électronique Ouverte (CLEO, Cléo; transl. Centre for Open Electronic Publishing), based in Marseille, France, is overseen by Aix-Marseille University, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences, and University of Avignon and the Vaucluse. It produces the open access academic publishing portal OpenEdition.org, which includes platforms Calenda, Hypotheses, OpenEdition Books, and OpenEdition Journals. OpenEdition focuses on publications in the academic fields of humanities and social sciences. The centre also issues a blog about open access.
OpenEdition Books
include:
Bak-Geller, Sarah (28 July 2022). "Patrimonio alimentario y ciudadanía indígena. El caso coca de Mezcala, Jalisco (México)". In Rebaï, Nasser; Bilhaut, Anne-Gaël; de Suremain, Charles-Édouard; Katz, Esther; Paredes, Myriam (eds.). Patrimonios alimentarios en América Latina : Recursos locales, actores y globalización (in Spanish). IRD Éditions.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Centre pour l'Édition Électronique Ouverte” is centre for Open Electronic Publishing. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Centre, pour and l'Édition, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “centre for Open Electronic Publishing” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2945983. VIAF identifies the subject as 144756192. The Library of Congress control number is no2013021694. 6 of 7 selected statements include explicit references; 3 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2022.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Centre pour l'Édition Électronique Ouverte”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Centre pour l'Édition Électronique Ouverte primary sources, Centre pour l'Édition Électronique Ouverte archive and Centre research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Centre pour l'Édition Électronique Ouverte”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Centre pour l'Édition Électronique Ouverte” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.