Review of Keynesian Economics
academic journal
The Review of Keynesian Economics (ROKE) is a quarterly double-blind peer-reviewed academic journal covering Keynesian and Post-Keynesian economics, although it is also open to other heterodox traditions. It is published by Edward Elgar Publishing and was established in 2012. The journal was co-founded by Thomas Palley (New America Foundation), Louis-Philippe Rochon (Laurentian University), and Matías Vernengo (Bucknell University). The goal was a broad Keynesian journal that encompassed all the different Keynesian schools of thought. Palley has written a brief account of how the journal came to be. Louis-Philippe Rochon was instrumental in creating the journal. In 2018 Rochon stepped down and became Editor Emeritus and he was replaced by Esteban Pérez Caldentey (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) as the third co-editor.
The public source identifies “Review of Keynesian Economics” as academic journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Review, Keynesian and Economics.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Review of Keynesian Economics”, the useful work is to connect “academic journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q22080532. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2012 and 2018.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Review of Keynesian Economics”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Review of Keynesian Economics primary sources, Review of Keynesian Economics archive and Review research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Review of Keynesian Economics”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Review of Keynesian Economics” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.