CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Resource consent

authorisation given to certain activities or uses of natural and physical resources required under the New Zealand Resource Management Act (the "RMA")

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 26, 2025
Entity authorityQ7315821
Source-derived summary

A resource consent is the authorisation given to certain activities or uses of natural and physical resources required under the New Zealand Resource Management Act (the "RMA"). Some activities may either be specifically authorised by the RMA or be permitted activities authorised by rules in plans. Any activities that are not permitted by the RMA, or by a rule in a plan, require a resource consent before they are carried out.

Definition and nature

The term "resource consent" is defined as;

a permit to carry out an activity that would otherwise contravene a rule in a city or district plan.

a permission required for an activity that might affect the environment, and that isn't allowed 'as of right' in the district or regional plan.

A resource consent, once granted to an applicant, is neither real nor personal property. Therefore, resource consents cannot be 'owned'; they are 'held' by 'consent holders'.

Types

A resource consent means any of the following:

land use consent (Section 9 and 13)

subdivision consent (Section 11)

water permit (Section 14)

discharge permit (Section 15)

coastal permit. (Section 12)

Plan classifications

Regional and district plans may give an activity that requires a resource consent one of six possible classifications.

The above table is of a very summary nature, and exceptions apply in some circumstances.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Resource consent” as authorisation given to certain activities or uses of natural and physical resources required under the New Zealand Resource Management Act (the "RMA"). Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 217-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Resource, consent and authorisation can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as authorisation given to certain activities or uses of natural and physical resources required under the New Zealand Resource Management Act (the "RMA"). Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 26, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7315821. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Resource consent”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Resource consent primary sources, Resource consent archive and Resource research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Resource consent”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Resource consent” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.