CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Rotylenchulus reniformis

species of worm

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 17, 2025
Entity authorityQ7370726
Source-derived summary

Rotylenchulus reniformis, the reniform nematode, is a species of parasitic nematode of plants with a worldwide distribution in the tropical and subtropical regions.

Taxonomy

This nematode has a wide host range, infecting many species of plants around the world. It was first observed on the roots of cowpea in Hawaii, and was described as new species and new genus in 1940. Its specific epithet, reniformis, was inspired by the kidney shape of the adult female. There are now ten species classified in the genus, but R. reniformis is the only species of major economic importance to agriculture. Recent studies have demonstrated R. macrosoma is the sister species to R. reniformis.

Distribution and host range

R. reniformis has been reported from thousands of localities in the Americas, Africa, Europe, Asia, and Australia. It has a wide host range that includes fruit trees, lentil, cotton, pigeon pea, tea, tobacco, soybean, pineapple, banana, okra, coconut, cabbage, sweet potato, alfalfa, corn, asparagus, palm, cucumber, tomato, squash, cassava, radish, eggplant, guava, melon, chickpea, and ginger. Certain plants are considered to be non-hosts of the nematode, such as little barley, common barnyard grass, pangola grass, peppers, and some cultivars of black mustard, oat, spinach, and sugarcane.

Morphology

The reniform nematode has esophageal glands overlapping the intestine and a short stylet.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Rotylenchulus reniformis” is species of worm. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Rotylenchulus, reniformis and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1940—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Rotylenchulus, reniformis and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of worm” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 17, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7370726. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1940.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rotylenchulus reniformis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rotylenchulus reniformis primary sources, Rotylenchulus reniformis archive and Rotylenchulus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rotylenchulus reniformis”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Rotylenchulus reniformis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.