CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Rendleman–Bartter model

short rate model describing the evolution of interest rates

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ7312852 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Rendleman–Bartter model

(Richard J. Rendleman, Jr. and Brit J. Bartter ) in finance is a short-rate model describing the evolution of interest rates.

It is a "one factor model" as it describes interest rate movements as driven by only one source of market risk. As a stochastic asset model, it can be used in the valuation of interest rate derivatives.

The model specifies that the instantaneous interest rate follows a geometric Brownian motion:

d

r

t

=

θ

r

t

d

t

+

σ

r

t

d

W

t

{\displaystyle dr_{t}=\theta r_{t}\,dt+\sigma r_{t}\,dW_{t}}

where Wt is a Wiener process modelling the random market risk factor. The drift parameter,

θ

{\displaystyle \theta }

, represents a constant expected instantaneous rate of change in the interest rate, while the standard deviation parameter,

σ

{\displaystyle \sigma }

, determines the volatility of the interest rate.

This is one of the early models of the short-term interest rates, using the same stochastic process as the one already used to describe the dynamics of the underlying price in stock options. Its main disadvantage is that it does not capture the mean reversion of interest rates (their tendency to revert toward some value or range of values rather than wander without bounds in either direction).

Note that in 1979 Rendleman and Bartter also published

an early version

of the Binomial options pricing model for equity underlyings.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Rendleman–Bartter model” as short rate model describing the evolution of interest rates. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1979—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Rendleman, Bartter and model can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as short rate model describing the evolution of interest rates. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7312852. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1979.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rendleman–Bartter model”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rendleman–Bartter model primary sources, Rendleman–Bartter model archive and Rendleman research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rendleman–Bartter model”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Rendleman–Bartter model” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.