CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Remento

software

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 15, 2025
Entity authorityQ136540458
Source-derived summary

Remento is an American online platform specializing in family memory preservation through storytelling and storybooks.

History

Remento was founded in 2020 by Charlie Greene and Alex Massonneau in Los Angeles, California, as a project to preserve family memories. Greene's interest in memory preservation began in childhood, inspired by home videos of his father, who died when Greene was ten years old. In 2017, following his mother's cancer diagnosis, Greene conducted an oral history interview to capture her voice, uncovering stories and insights he had never heard before. The name Remento is a Portmanteau of "remember" and "memento."

In September 2022, Remento announced that it had raised funding from Upfront Ventures, along with a group of angel investors, including Chuck Davis, Emmy Rossum, Sam Esmail, Dan Nova (of Highland Capital Partners), and Sarah Harden to further expand its operations.

In November 2023, Remento introduced Remento Book, an AI-based service that generates physical books from recorded family narratives.

In March 2025, Remento appeared in Season 16 of the ABC television series Shark Tank, where it received an investment from Mark Cuban.

Platform

Remento is a storytelling platform that preserves family histories by converting recorded oral narratives into digital and printed formats. Through its Remento Book service, participants can respond to weekly emailed prompts using a web-based recorder. The recording is transcribed using an AI-based system called Speech-to-Story, which generates written versions of the stories.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Remento” is software. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Remento and software, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020, 2017, 2022, 2023—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Remento and software is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “software” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 15, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q136540458. The first chronological checks are 2020, 2017, 2022 and 2023.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Remento”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Remento primary sources, Remento archive and Remento research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Remento”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Remento” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.