CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Regular complex polygon

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ86762015
Source-derived summary

In geometry, a regular complex polygon is a generalization of a regular polygon in real space to an analogous structure in a complex Hilbert space, where each real dimension is accompanied by an imaginary one. A regular polygon exists in 2 real dimensions,

R

2

{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}}

, while a complex polygon exists in two complex dimensions,

C

2

{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{2}}

, which can be given real representations in 4 dimensions,

R

4

{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{4}}

, which then must be projected down to 2 or 3 real dimensions to be visualized. A complex polygon is generalized as a complex polytope in

C

n

{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n}}

.

A complex polygon may be understood as a collection of complex points, lines, planes, and so on, where every point is the junction of multiple lines, every line of multiple planes, and so on.

The regular complex polygons have been completely characterized, and can be described using a symbolic notation developed by Coxeter.

A regular complex polygon with all 2-edges can be represented by a graph, while forms with k-edges can only be related by hypergraphs. A k-edge can be seen as a set of vertices, with no order implied. They may be drawn with pairwise 2-edges, but this is not structurally accurate.

Regular complex polygons

While 1-polytopes can have unlimited p, finite regular complex polygons, excluding the double prism polygons p{4}2, are limited to 5-edge (pentagonal edges) elements, and infinite regular apeirogons also include 6-edge (hexagonal edges) elements.

Notations

Shephard's modified Schläfli notation

Shephard originally devised a modified form of Schläfli's notation for regular polytopes.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Regular complex polygon” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Regular, complex and polygon.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 270-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Regular, complex and polygon providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Regular complex polygon”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q86762015. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Regular complex polygon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Regular complex polygon primary sources, Regular complex polygon archive and Regular research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Regular complex polygon”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Regular complex polygon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.