Regis Rangers
intercollegiate sports teams of Regis University
The Regis Rangers are the athletic teams that represent Regis University, located in Denver, Colorado, in NCAA Division II intercollegiate sports. The Rangers compete as members of the Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference for all 14 varsity programs.
Athletic director
In January 2023 Tommy Gilhooly was announced as athletic director. He assumed the role from interim athletic director, Kate Whalen, who helped guide the Rangers into a smooth transition.
David Spafford was the interim athletic director in 2016 and took over the role permanently for seven years from 2016-2022.
Ann Martin was promoted to the position of athletic director in 2010, succeeding Barb Schroeder who retired after being director for nearly fifteen years.
Varsity sports
Teams
In the 2024 academic school year, the Regis athletics program saw great success. The Rangers earned RMAC Championships in volleyball, Women's lacrosse, softball, Women's basketball, and Women's Golf. The Women's lacrosse team made the NCAA Final 4 for the third time in program history while the Women's basketball team completed a back-to-back conference championship run which resulted in a berth in the NCAA tournament where they won their first-round match-up. The baseball program also earned an NCAA tournament bid after a historic season.
“Regis Rangers” enters the record as intercollegiate sports teams of Regis University. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Regis, Rangers and intercollegiate can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Regis Rangers” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Regis, Rangers and intercollegiate provides the most credible route into that argument.
Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16821987. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2023, 2016, 2022 and 2010.
Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Regis Rangers”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Regis Rangers primary sources, Regis Rangers archive and Regis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Regis Rangers”?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Regis Rangers” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.