Reginald Beseley
English Member of Parliament
Reginald Beseley was one of two Members of the Parliament of England for the borough of Scarborough in 1545, 1547, the November session of 1554 and in 1559. He also represented the borough of Thirsk in the March session of 1553 and the April session of 1554, as well as the borough of Knaresborough in the October session of 1553 and also the constituency of York in 1555.
Life and politics
There is little recorded about Reginald's early life. He is noted as being a tenant on lands belonging to Furness Abbey in 1530 and a number of letters verify his profession as a lawyer in 1533, 1534 and 1548. He held several offices across the county of Yorkshire during his lifetime. Most notably those of recorder for Scarborough in 1547; treasurer to Admiral Seymour in 1547; Vice -Admiral in the North, also in 1547 and 1548; clerk of the court and castle of York in 1555. His numerous terms as MP for several constituencies is reported to have been due to the support of Francis Talbot, 5th Earl of Shrewsbury, who was president of the Council of the North at the time.
He married Alice and had one son and two daughters, Agnes and Anne.
“Reginald Beseley” enters the record as english Member of Parliament. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Reginald, Beseley and English can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Reginald Beseley” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Reginald, Beseley and English provides the most credible route into that argument.
Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q108428033. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1545, 1547, 1554 and 1559.
Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Reginald Beseley”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Reginald Beseley primary sources, Reginald Beseley archive and Reginald research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Reginald Beseley”?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Reginald Beseley” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.