CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Regina Santella

researcher

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ113619023 ↗
Source-derived summary

Regina Maria (Padronaggio) Santella (born 1948) is an American environmental scientist who is an emeritus professor at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. She used molecular epidemiology studies and laboratory assays to understand the role of environmental, lifestyle and occupational carcinogens in cancer development as well as to identify susceptible populations. She is the former Director of Columbia's NIEHS Center for Environmental Health in Northern Manhattan, Chair of the American Association for Cancer Research Molecular Epidemiology Working Group and Vice Dean of Faculty at Mailman.

Early life and education

Santella was an undergraduate at Brooklyn College. She moved to the University of Massachusetts Amherst for graduate studies, where she specialized in organic chemistry. Her doctoral research, which she performed at the City University of New York, investigated the interaction of proteins with DNA.

Research and career

Santella has studied how environmental chemicals primarily polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), ubiquitous pollutants, and aflatoxin, a dietary toxin produced by a mold, cause cancer. She has enabled precise carcinogen detection through highly specific and sensitive immunoassays. These assays use monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies developed by Santella to measure DNA and protein binding of the carcinogens to produce adducts as well metabolites of the carcinogens in urine. One of the first studies demonstrated that women who smoke had higher levels of PAH-DNA damage in their placental tissue than nonsmokers. Later studies revealed elevated DNA damage in people with environmental, occupational or lifestyle exposures.

Editorial summary

“Regina Santella” enters the record as researcher. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Regina, Santella and researcher can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1948—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Regina, Santella and researcher.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Regina Santella” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Regina, Santella and researcher provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q113619023. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1948.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Regina Santella”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Regina Santella primary sources, Regina Santella archive and Regina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Regina Santella”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Regina Santella” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.