Regina Rameika
American physicist

Regina Abby Rameika is an American experimental neutrino physicist known for her work with the DONUT collaboration at Fermilab, which provided the first direct observations of the tau neutrino. She continues to work as a distinguished scientist at Fermilab, where she is co-spokesperson for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE).
Career and research
Rameika majored in physics at Rutgers University, graduating in 1976. She completed her Ph.D. at Rutgers in 1982, and joined Fermilab in the same year. She was named a distinguished scientist at Fermilab in 2008.
Although one of her freshman college papers involved solar neutrinos, Rameika's early work at Rutgers and Fermilab involved the polarization and magnetic moments of hyperons. Her interests shifted to neutrino physics in the 1990s, and involved the NuMI, MINOS, NOvA, and MicroBooNE projects as well as the DONUT project. She was project manager for MINOS, and from 2014 to 2016 served as head of the Fermilab Neutrino Division. She was production coordinator and resource coordinator for DUNE before becoming its co-spokesperson.
Recognition
Rameika was named a Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) in 2001, after a nomination from the APS Division of Particles and Fields, "for her crucial role in establishing the first direct evidence for the tau neutrino".
The public source identifies “Regina Rameika” as american physicist. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Regina, Rameika and American.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Regina Rameika”, the useful work is to connect “american physicist” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q111383987. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1976, 1982, 2008 and 2014.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Regina Rameika”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Regina Rameika primary sources, Regina Rameika archive and Regina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Regina Rameika”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Regina Rameika” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.