Reductio ad absurdum
form of argument in informal logic

In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin for "argument to absurdity"), apagogical argument, or proof by contradiction, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that following the logic of a contrary proposition or argument would lead to absurdity or contradiction. Although it is quite freely used in mathematical proofs, not every school of mathematical thought accepts this kind of nonconstructive proof.
This argument form traces back to Ancient Greek philosophy and has been used throughout history in both formal mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate. In mathematics, the technique is called proof by contradiction. In formal logic, this technique is captured by an inference rule for reductio ad absurdum.
More broadly, proof by contradiction is any form of argument that establishes a statement by arriving at a contradiction, even when the initial assumption is not the negation of the statement to be proved. In this general sense, proof by contradiction is also known as indirect proof, proof by assuming the opposite, and reductio ad impossibile.
Examples
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range of forms, as can be seen in the following examples of refutation by contradiction:
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, since the Earth is assumed to be finite in extent, we would find people falling off the edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number; if
q
{\displaystyle q}
were the smallest positive rational, then
q
/
2
{\displaystyle q/2}
would be a positive rational number that is smaller than
q
{\displaystyle q}
because it equals half of
q
{\displaystyle q}
, and it would also not be smaller than
q
{\displaystyle q}
because
q
{\displaystyle q}
is assumed to be the smallest positive rational.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses (empirical evidence).
“Reductio ad absurdum” enters the record as form of argument in informal logic. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Reductio, absurdum and form can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Reductio ad absurdum” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Reductio, absurdum and form provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q14402006. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Reductio ad absurdum”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Reductio ad absurdum primary sources, Reductio ad absurdum archive and Reductio research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Reductio ad absurdum”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Reductio ad absurdum” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.