Suspension (topology)
quotient space; operation of suspension creates a way of moving up in dimension (dimension n + 1)

In topology, a branch of mathematics, the suspension of a topological space X is intuitively obtained by stretching X into a cylinder and then collapsing both end faces to points. One views X as "suspended" between these end points. The suspension of X is denoted by SX or susp(X).
There is a variant of the suspension for a pointed space, which is called the reduced suspension and denoted by ΣX. The "usual" suspension SX is sometimes called the unreduced suspension, unbased suspension, or free suspension of X, to distinguish it from ΣX.
Free suspension
The (free) suspension
S
X
{\displaystyle SX}
of a topological space
X
{\displaystyle X}
can be defined in several ways.
1.
S
X
{\displaystyle SX}
is the quotient space
(
X
×
[
0
,
1
]
)
/
(
X
×
{
0
}
)
/
(
X
×
{
1
}
)
.
{\displaystyle (X\times [0,1])/(X\times \{0\}){\big /}(X\times \{1\}).}
In other words, it can be constructed as follows:
Construct the cylinder
X
×
[
0
,
1
]
{\displaystyle X\times [0,1]}
.
Consider the entire set
X
×
{
0
}
{\displaystyle X\times \{0\}}
as a single point ("glue" all its points together).
Consider the entire set
X
×
{
1
}
{\displaystyle X\times \{1\}}
as a single point ("glue" all its points together).
2.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Suspension (topology)” is quotient space; operation of suspension creates a way of moving up in dimension (dimension n + 1). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Suspension, topology and quotient, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “quotient space; operation of suspension creates a way of moving up in dimension (dimension n + 1)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1307987. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Suspension (topology)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Suspension (topology) primary sources, Suspension (topology) archive and Suspension research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Suspension (topology)”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Suspension (topology)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.