CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Redemption Maddie

2007 film

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ7305763
Source-derived summary

Redemption Maddie is a 2007 short film directed by Aaron King and stars Allison Scagliotti. The film was completed as part of the American Film Institute Conservatory's MFA Program.

The film began touring the festival circuit in 2007, premiering at the 22nd Annual Santa Barbara International Film Festival. It has won several awards including a Grand Jury Prize for Student Shorts at the AFI Dallas International Film Festival, Best Short Film and Best Actress at BendFilm Festival, and Best Screenplay at the Hollyshorts Film Festival. After completing its festival run, Maddie was distributed by Reframe and Amazon for DVD and digital purchase.

The film's official website provides the following description"In the wake of tragedy, 14 year old Maddie Clifford employs manipulation, insulin syringes, and an ill-fated rabbit in a startling quest for redemption."The synopsis highlights an aspect of the film's plot which revolves around the so-called rabbit test, a practice employed to detect pregnancy used in the early twentieth century.

Cast

Allison Scagliotti as Maddie Clifford

Kevin Montgomery as Tyler

Michael Catlin as Mr. Clifford

Peggy Goss as Mrs. Clifford

Christopher Dobler as James

Gisselle Castellanos as Classmate Girl #1

Jay Collette as Neighbor boy

Paige Cooper as Nurse Fisher

Skyler Day as Classmate Girl #2

Gabi DuBay as Maddie's Classmate

Kennis Frommel as Baby

Bella Frommell as Baby

Chandler M. Guidroz as Doctor

Steve Humphreys as Mr.

Editorial summary

“Redemption Maddie” enters the record as 2007 film. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Redemption, Maddie and film can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2007-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Redemption, Maddie and film.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Redemption Maddie” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Redemption, Maddie and film provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7305763. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2007.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Redemption Maddie”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Redemption Maddie primary sources, Redemption Maddie archive and Redemption research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Redemption Maddie”?
  2. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Redemption Maddie” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.