CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Velocity obstacle

term in robotics and motion planning

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ7919299
Source-derived summary

In robotics and motion planning, a velocity obstacle, commonly abbreviated VO, is the set of all velocities of a robot that will result in a collision with another robot at some moment in time, assuming that the other robot maintains its current velocity. If the robot chooses a velocity inside the velocity obstacle then the two robots will eventually collide, if it chooses a velocity outside the velocity obstacle, such a collision is guaranteed not to occur.

This algorithm for robot collision avoidance has been repeatedly rediscovered and published under different names:

in 1989 as a maneuvering board approach,

in 1993 it was first introduced as the "velocity obstacle",

in 1998 as collision cones,

and in 2009 as forbidden velocity maps.

The same algorithm has been used in maritime port navigation since at least 1903.

The velocity obstacle for a robot

A

{\displaystyle A}

induced by a robot

B

{\displaystyle B}

may be formally written as

V

O

A

|

B

=

{

v

|

t

>

0

:

(

v

v

B

)

t

D

(

x

B

x

A

,

r

A

+

r

B

)

}

{\displaystyle VO_{A|B}=\{\mathbf {v} \,|\,\exists t>0:(\mathbf {v} -\mathbf {v} _{B})t\in D(\mathbf {x} _{B}-\mathbf {x} _{A},r_{A}+r_{B})\}}

where

A

{\displaystyle A}

has position

x

A

{\displaystyle \mathbf {x} _{A}}

and radius

r

A

{\displaystyle r_{A}}

, and

B

{\displaystyle B}

has position

x

B

{\displaystyle \mathbf {x} _{B}}

, radius

r

B

{\displaystyle r_{B}}

, and velocity

v

B

{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} _{B}}

. The notation

D

(

x

,

r

)

{\displaystyle D(\mathbf {x} ,r)}

represents a disc with center

x

{\displaystyle \mathbf {x} }

and radius

r

{\displaystyle r}

.

Variations include common velocity obstacles (CVO), finite-time-interval velocity obstacles (FVO), generalized velocity obstacles (GVO), hybrid reciprocal velocity obstacles (HRVO), nonlinear velocity obstacles (NLVO), reciprocal velocity obstacles (RVO), and recursive probabilistic velocity obstacles (PVO).

Editorial summary

“Velocity obstacle” enters the record as term in robotics and motion planning. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Velocity, obstacle and term can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1989, 1993, 1998, 2009—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Velocity, obstacle and term.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Velocity obstacle” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Velocity, obstacle and term provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7919299. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1989, 1993, 1998 and 2009.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Velocity obstacle”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Velocity obstacle primary sources, Velocity obstacle archive and Velocity research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Velocity obstacle”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Velocity obstacle” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.