Rectangular lattice
2-dimensional lattice

The rectangular lattice and centered rectangular lattice (or rhombic lattice) constitute two of the five two-dimensional Bravais lattice types. The symmetry categories of these lattices are wallpaper groups pmm and cmm respectively. The conventional translation vectors of the rectangular lattices form an angle of 90° and are of unequal lengths.
Bravais lattices
There are two rectangular Bravais lattices: primitive rectangular and centered rectangular (or rhombic).
The primitive rectangular lattice can also be described by a centered rhombic unit cell, while the centered rectangular lattice can also be described by a primitive rhombic unit cell. Note that the length
a
{\displaystyle a}
in the lower row is not the same as in the upper row. For the first column above,
a
{\displaystyle a}
of the second row equals
a
2
+
b
2
{\displaystyle {\sqrt {a^{2}+b^{2}}}}
of the first row, and for the second column it equals
1
2
a
2
+
b
2
{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {a^{2}+b^{2}}}}
.
Crystal classes
The rectangular lattice class names, Schönflies notation, Hermann-Mauguin notation, orbifold notation, Coxeter notation, and wallpaper groups are listed in the table below.
The public source identifies “Rectangular lattice” as 2-dimensional lattice. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Rectangular, lattice and 2-dimensional.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Rectangular lattice”, the useful work is to connect “2-dimensional lattice” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q114414417. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Rectangular lattice”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Rectangular lattice primary sources, Rectangular lattice archive and Rectangular research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rectangular lattice”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Rectangular lattice” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.