CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Receiver operating characteristic

performance of a binary classifier system as its discrimination threshold is varied

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ327120
Source-derived summary

A receiver operating characteristic curve, or ROC curve, is a graphical plot that illustrates the performance of a binary classifier model (although it can be generalized to multiple classes) at varying threshold values. ROC analysis is commonly applied in the assessment of diagnostic test performance in clinical epidemiology.

The ROC curve is the plot of the true positive rate (TPR) against the false positive rate (FPR) at each threshold setting.

The ROC can also be thought of as a plot of the statistical power as a function of the Type I Error of the decision rule (when the performance is calculated from just a sample of the population, it can be thought of as estimators of these quantities). The ROC curve is thus the sensitivity as a function of false positive rate.

Given that the probability distributions for both true positive and false positive are known, the ROC curve is obtained as the cumulative distribution function (CDF, area under the probability distribution from

{\displaystyle -\infty }

to the discrimination threshold) of the detection probability in the y-axis versus the CDF of the false positive probability on the x-axis.

ROC analysis provides tools to select possibly optimal models and to discard suboptimal ones independently from (and prior to specifying) the cost context or the class distribution. ROC analysis is related in a direct and natural way to the cost/benefit analysis of diagnostic decision making.

Terminology

The true-positive rate is also known as sensitivity or probability of detection. The false-positive rate is also known as the probability of false alarm and equals (1 − specificity).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Receiver operating characteristic” as performance of a binary classifier system as its discrimination threshold is varied. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 265-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Receiver, operating and characteristic can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as performance of a binary classifier system as its discrimination threshold is varied. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q327120. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Receiver operating characteristic”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Receiver operating characteristic primary sources, Receiver operating characteristic archive and Receiver research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Receiver operating characteristic”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Receiver operating characteristic” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.