CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Raoulia

genus of plants

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ310366
Source-derived summary

Raoulia is a genus of New Zealand plants in the tribe Gnaphalieae within the family Asteraceae.

Many Raoulia species grow in alpine areas, forming very fine and dense growths. These compact growths form large amorphous cushion-like masses with only the growing tips visible. Due to their shape and form, the plant clusters resemble sheep from afar, this giving them their alternate name, vegetable sheep.

Haastia pulvinaris is another species of plant in the aster family that is also known as vegetable sheep, and which grows in similar environments.

The range of some species, such as Raoulia beauverdii, includes coastal places.

Taxonomy

Species

Formerly included

Argyrotegium mackayi (Raoulia mackayi)

Cultivation

Slow spreading, flat rock garden plant with silver-gray, almost moss-like, foliage.

sun: full sun, part shade

height: 50 mm (2 in)

width: spreads to around 300 mm (1 ft).

Editorial summary

“Raoulia” enters the record as genus of plants. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Raoulia, genus and plants can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 138-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Raoulia, genus and plants.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Raoulia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Raoulia, genus and plants provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q310366. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Raoulia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Raoulia primary sources, Raoulia archive and Raoulia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Raoulia”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Raoulia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.