Ramses II tank
type of main battle tank

The Ramses II tank is a heavily modernized T-55 main battle tank designed for and used by the Egyptian Armed Forces. A single T-54 was sent to the United States for upgrading. A primary prototype was sent to Egypt where extensive trials were completed in late 1987. Additional tests were conducted in 1990. Sources are often contradictory on the Ramses II tank service history and number of vehicles built, with some stating that it entered service in relatively small numbers, while according to another source the tank never got past the prototype stage.
Background
After the Soviet Union exported large numbers of T-54 and T-55 tanks for several Middle Eastern countries, other countries saw an opportunity to offer comprehensive upgrade packages. In the 1970s West Germany upgraded several hundred T-54/55 tanks for the Egyptian Army, fitting them with AEG-Telefunken white/infrared searchlights and some with Iskra laser rangerfinders. These tanks were designated as the T-55E (Egyptian) Mark 0. The Egyptians sought to further modernize them with American and West German assistance, but most of these projects were abandoned, leading to allegations that the T-54/55 modernization program was a corruption scheme led by senior officials and the funds needed to upgrade the tanks were never available in the first place.
Design
The Ramses II featured a modified rear hull to accommodate a new powerpack consisting of a TCM AVDS-1790-5A turbocharged diesel engine developing 908 brake horsepower (677 kW) (similar to the M60A3 tank engine) coupled to a Renk RK-304 transmission.
“Ramses II tank” enters the record as type of main battle tank. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Ramses, tank and type can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Ramses II tank” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Ramses, tank and type provides the most credible route into that argument.
Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2007972. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1987, 1990 and 1790.
Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Ramses II tank”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Ramses II tank primary sources, Ramses II tank archive and Ramses research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ramses II tank”?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Ramses II tank” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.