CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Ramalina polyforma

species of fungus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ10648727
Source-derived summary

Ramalina polyforma is a species of saxicolous (rock-dwelling), fruticose lichen in the family Ramalinaceae. This greenish-grey shrubby lichen, endemic to the Galápagos Islands, was formally described as a new species in 2007 by Dutch lichenologist André Aptroot.

Taxonomy

Ramalina polyforma was first identified and described in 2007 by Dutch lichenologist André Aptroot. The species epithet, polyforma, reflects the variable physical structure of this species, aptly capturing its morphological diversity. The type specimen for this species was collected by the author on the coastal lava cliffs east of Puerto Ayora near the Charles Darwin Research Station in the Galápagos Islands.

Description

Characterised by its highly variable branching pattern, Ramalina polyforma is generally shrubby with a dull appearance, its greenish-grey thallus reaching diameters up to 3 cm (1.2 in). The branching pattern can range from few, stout, and broadly flattened branches reminiscent of antlers with curled tips, to densely ramified, irregularly angular branches. These branches tend to become rounder at their tips and occasionally display curled ends, resembling hooks.

The surface of this lichen is irregularly striate and wrinkled due to the cartilaginous cortical strands. The yellowish soredia, capitate or irregular in form, usually appear terminal and can reach diameters of approximately 1 mm.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Ramalina polyforma” is species of fungus. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Ramalina, polyforma and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Ramalina, polyforma and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of fungus” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10648727. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ramalina polyforma”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ramalina polyforma primary sources, Ramalina polyforma archive and Ramalina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ramalina polyforma”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ramalina polyforma” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.