Peto baronets
baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom

There have been two baronetcies created for members of the Peto family, both in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. As of 2014, both creations are extant.
The Peto baronetcy, of Somerleyton Hall in the County of Suffolk, was created in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom on 22 February 1855 for the entrepreneur and Liberal politician Samuel Morton Peto. He was a railway contractor and also represented Norwich, Finsbury and Bristol in the House of Commons.
The Peto baronetcy, of Barnstaple in the County of Devon, was created in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom on 27 January 1927 for the Conservative politician Basil Peto. He sat as Member of Parliament for Devizes and Barnstaple. Peto was the seventh son of the first Baronet of the 1855 creation.
Peto baronets, of Somerleyton Hall (1855)
Sir Samuel Morton Peto, 1st Baronet (1809–1889)
Sir Henry Peto, 2nd Baronet (1840–1938)
Sir (Henry) Francis Morton Peto, 3rd Baronet (1889–1978)
Sir Henry George Morton Peto, 4th Baronet (1920–2010)
Sir Francis Michael Morton Peto, 5th Baronet (born 1949)
The heir apparent is the present holder's son David James Morton Peto (born 1978).
Peto baronets, of Barnstaple (1927)
Sir Basil Edward Peto, 1st Baronet (1862–1945)
Sir James Michael Peto, 2nd Baronet (1894–1971)
Sir Christopher Henry Maxwell Peto, 3rd Baronet (1897–1980)
Sir Michael Henry Basil Peto, 4th Baronet (1938–2008)
Sir Henry Christopher Morton Bampfylde Peto, 5th Baronet (born 1967)
The heir apparent is the present holder's son Jake Christopher Bampfylde Peto (born 2004).
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Peto baronets” as baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7178475. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2014, 1855, 1927 and 1809.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Peto baronets”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Peto baronets primary sources, Peto baronets archive and Peto research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peto baronets”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Peto baronets” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.