CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Rēzekne

state city in eastern Latvia

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ180379
Source-derived summary

Rēzekne (Latvian: [ˈrɛːzekne] , Latgalian: Rēzne pronounced [rʲæːzʲnʲæ] or Rēzekne pronounced [ˈrʲæːzʲækʲnʲæ], Russian: Резекне) is a state city in the Rēzekne River valley in the Latgale region of eastern Latvia. It is called The Heart of Latgale (Latvian: Latgales sirds, Latgalian: Latgolys sirds). Built on seven hills, Rēzekne is situated 242 kilometres (150 miles) east of Riga, and 63 kilometres (39 miles) west of the Latvian-Russian border, at the intersection of the Moscow – Ventspils railway and Warsaw – Saint Petersburg Railways. It is the 7th largest city in Latvia. Rēzekne also serves as the location of the extraterritorial administrative centre of Rēzekne Municipality.

Other names

The Latgalian name of the city is Rēzne (Latgalian: [rʲæːzʲnʲæ]) or Rēzekne (pronounced [ˈrʲæːzʲækʲnʲæ]). Historically, in German sources, the location has been known as Rositten. It is called Rzeżyca in Polish. Under the Russian Empire the city was named Rezhitsa (Russian: Рѣжица; Yiddish: רעזשיצע, romanized: Rezhitse), but since Soviet period known as Резекне (Russian pronunciation: [ˈrʲɛzɛknɛ]).

History

A Latgalian hill fort is known to have existed at Rēzekne from the 9th to the 13th centuries, until its destruction at the hands of German crusaders of the Livonian Order.

Editorial summary

“Rēzekne” enters the record as state city in eastern Latvia. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rēzekne, state and city can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost useful as a place-based finding aid connecting the present description to earlier jurisdictions, maps and built evidence. The current 194-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1773. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Rēzekne, state and city.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Rēzekne” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rēzekne, state and city provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q180379. VIAF identifies the subject as 140791043. The Library of Congress control number is n85238500. Authority coordinates are 56.507, 27.331. 3 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rēzekne”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rēzekne primary sources, Rēzekne archive and Rēzekne research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rēzekne”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Rēzekne” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.