Radiocyatha
class of sponge-like animals
Radiocyatha is an extinct group of sponge-like animals which lived in the early to mid-Cambrian Period (Tommotian to Toyonian).
Details
They were very similar to archaeocyath sponges, with a cup-shaped calcareous body up to 20 cm (7.9 inches) in height. One major difference is that the radiocyath skeleton is not composed of tiny calcite grains, but rather large aragonite plates, known as nesasters. Nesasters are star-shaped, with up to 20 radiating spokes in a flat plane. The outer wall of the cup has radial rods directed inwards. Uranosphaera is a simple single-walled radiocyath, while the hetairacyathids bear an additional nested wall layer, akin to archaeocyaths.
Radiocyaths reached their maximum abundance in the Atdabanian and Botomian, contributing towards the biomass of archaeocyath sponge reefs in regions such as Mongolia and Australia. Sponge affinities for radiocyaths are plausible but uncertain; the snowflake-shaped spicules of heteractinid sponges show some similarity to nesasters. Radiocyaths have been compared to the enigmatic receptaculitids, which also have calcareous plates and radiating rod-like structures. Radiocyatha is tentatively ranked as a class.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Radiocyatha” as class of sponge-like animals. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as class of sponge-like animals. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q118378313. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Radiocyatha”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Radiocyatha primary sources, Radiocyatha archive and Radiocyatha research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Radiocyatha”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Radiocyatha” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.