RO5203648
pharmaceutical compound
RO5203648 is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) partial agonist. It is a potent and highly selective partial agonist of both rodent and primate TAAR1. The drug suppresses the effects of psychostimulants like cocaine and methamphetamine. It also produces a variety of other behavioral effects, such as antidepressant-like, antipsychotic-like, and antiaddictive effects. Research with RO5203648 has led to interest in TAAR1 agonists for potential treatment of drug addiction. RO5203648 itself was not developed for potential medical use due to poor expected human pharmacokinetics.
Pharmacology
Pharmacodynamics
Actions
RO5203648 binds to the mouse, rat, cynomolgus monkey, and human TAAR1 all with high affinity (Ki = 0.5–6.8 nM). It is a potent partial agonist in all species (EC50Tooltip half-maximal effective concentration = 4.0 to 31 nM), with an efficacy of 48 to 73% relative to the endogenous TAAR1 agonists β-phenethylamine and tyramine and the TAAR1 full agonist RO5166017. RO5203648 is highly selective for the TAAR1, showing ≥130-fold selectivity for the mouse TAAR1 over 149 other targets.
Effects
RO5203648 has been found to increase the firing rate of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopaminergic neurons and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) serotonergic neurons in mouse brain slices ex vivo.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “RO5203648” is pharmaceutical compound. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through RO5203648, pharmaceutical and compound, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “pharmaceutical compound” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131606025. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “RO5203648”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow RO5203648 primary sources, RO5203648 archive and RO5203648 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “RO5203648”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “RO5203648” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.