CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Nuclear Safety Commission (Taiwan)

Government agency of the Republic of China

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ5972441
Source-derived summary

The Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC; Chinese: 核能安全委員會; Tongyong Pinyin: Hénéng Āncyuán Wěiyuánhuèi; Tâi-lô: Hi̍k-lîng An-tsuân Úi-uân-huē) is an independent government agency of the Executive Yuan of Taiwan which is responsible for atomic safety, development and regulations. It also conducts research and development into atomic technologies. It is affiliated with IAEA by special agreements to safeguard the peaceful development of the nuclear energy by the Taiwan government.

History

The agency was created in 1955 as the Atomic Energy Council by the Executive Yuan. Since then, it has assisted industry in developing nuclear power for commercial use and allowed universities to conduct research into atomic energy. On 27 September 2023, the agency is renamed to Nuclear Safety Commission.

The agency is still primarily responsible for the supervision of nuclear power plants, nuclear facilities, and radiation workplaces. It also strictly implement the laws for nuclear safety control, radiation protection, environmental detection, and proper administration of radioactive waste management to ensure the safety of nuclear applications, general public and investigate applications for atomic energy.

Administrative structure

The agency is organized into the following areas.

Departments

Department of Nuclear Technology

Department of Radiation Protection

Department of Nuclear Regulation

Department of Planning

Offices

Office of Security

Office of Personnel

Office of Accounting

Secretariat

Agencies

Radiation Monitoring Center

Fuel Cycle and Materials Administration

National Atomic Research Institute

Advisory committees

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Legislation

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Facility Safety

Advisory Committee on Ionizing Radiation Safety

Advisory Committee on Radioactive Materials Safety

Supervising Committee on Nuclear Safety of the Lungmen Station

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Accident Investigation and Evaluation

Evaluation Committee on Research and Development Achievements

Advisory Committee on Handling of State Compensation Cases

List of ministers

Transportation

The council is near Fuhe Bridge, Yonghe District, New Taipei City.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Nuclear Safety Commission (Taiwan)” is government agency of the Republic of China. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Nuclear, Safety and Commission, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1955, 2023—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1955-05-31. For this dossier, Nuclear, Safety and Commission is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “government agency of the Republic of China” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5972441. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1955 and 2023.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nuclear Safety Commission (Taiwan)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nuclear Safety Commission (Taiwan) primary sources, Nuclear Safety Commission (Taiwan) archive and Nuclear research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nuclear Safety Commission (Taiwan)”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Nuclear Safety Commission (Taiwan)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.