Rural Municipality of Pinto Creek No. 75
rural municipality in Saskatchewan, Canada
The Rural Municipality of Pinto Creek No. 75 (2016 population: 283) is a rural municipality (RM) in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan within Census Division No. 3 and SARM Division No. 3. It is located in the southern portion of the province.
History
The RM of Pinto Creek No. 75 incorporated as a rural municipality on January 1, 1913. It is named after Pinto Creek that flows through the RM.
Geography
Communities and localities
The following urban municipalities are surrounded by the RM.
Villages
Hazenmore
Kincaid
The following unincorporated communities are within the RM.
Hamlets
Meyronne
Demographics
In the 2021 Census of Population conducted by Statistics Canada, the RM of Pinto Creek No. 75 had a population of 251 living in 85 of its 104 total private dwellings, a change of −12.8% from its 2016 population of 288. With a land area of 838.82 km2 (323.87 sq mi), it had a population density of 0.3/km2 (0.8/sq mi) in 2021.
The public source identifies “Rural Municipality of Pinto Creek No. 75” as rural municipality in Saskatchewan, Canada. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Rural, Municipality and Pinto.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Rural Municipality of Pinto Creek No. 75”, the useful work is to connect “rural municipality in Saskatchewan, Canada” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7196537. Authority coordinates are 49.639, -107.036. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2016, 1913 and 2021.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Rural Municipality of Pinto Creek No. 75”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Rural Municipality of Pinto Creek No. 75 primary sources, Rural Municipality of Pinto Creek No. 75 archive and Rural research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rural Municipality of Pinto Creek No. 75”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Rural Municipality of Pinto Creek No. 75” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.