CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bắc Gianh

ward in Quảng Trị, Vietnam

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ137844067 ↗
Source-derived summary

Bắc Gianh is a ward (phường) of Quảng Trị Province, Vietnam.

On June 16, 2025, the Standing Committee of the National Assembly issued Resolution No. 1680/NQ-UBTVQH15 on the reorganization of commune-level administrative units in Quảng Trị Province in 2025. Accordingly, the entire natural area and population of Quảng Phúc Ward, Quảng Thọ Ward, and Quảng Thuận Ward were reorganized to form a new ward named Bắc Gianh Ward.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Bắc Gianh” as ward in Quảng Trị, Vietnam. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2025, 1680—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Gianh, ward and Quảng can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as ward in Quảng Trị, Vietnam. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q137844067. Authority coordinates are 17.745, 106.450. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2025 and 1680.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bắc Gianh”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bắc Gianh primary sources, Bắc Gianh archive and Gianh research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bắc Gianh”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Bắc Gianh” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.